Posts Tagged ‘legal’
Iraq war logs: British legal threat as UN calls on Obama to look at torture claims – The Guardian
Last Updated on Saturday, 23 October 2010 01:26 Written by admin Saturday, 23 October 2010 01:26
Britain’s role in the alleged torture and unlawful killing of Iraqi civilians may be the subject of legal action following the publication of nearly 400,000 leaked military documents by the website WikiLeaks.
British lawyers said the classified US army field reports embroiled British as well as American forces in an alleged culture of abuse and extrajudicial killings in Iraq. Solicitor Phil Shiner of Public Interest Lawyers, appearing alongside WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange at a press conference in London today, said some of the deaths documented in the reports may have involved British forces and could now go through the UK courts.
The Iraq logs, Shiner said, indicated that UK as well as US commanders were likely to have ignored evidence of torture by the Iraqi authorities, contrary to international law. He said: “Some of these deaths will be in circumstances where the UK have a very clear legal responsibility. This may be because the Iraqis died while under the effective control of UK forces – under arrest, in vehicles, helicopters or detention facilities.”
A number of the documents detail allegations of abuse by UK soldiers. Two reports dated 23 June 2008 describe claims by two Iraqi men – both Shias – that they were punched and kicked by unidentified British soldiers. Both men, according to the reports on the WikiLeaks website, suffered injuries that would have been consistent with their claims. There is no apparent record of an investigation of the allegations.
The Ministry of Defence condemned the actions of WikiLeaks, adding that it investigated any allegations made against British troops. It said: “There is no place for mistreatment of detainees. Any civilian casualty is a matter of deep regret and we take any incidents extremely seriously.”
As Assange defended the decision to disclose the documents – saying it was of “immense importance” to reveal the truth about the conflict – the UN warned that if the logs pointed to clear violations of the UN convention against torture, Barack Obama’s administration had a clear obligation to investigate them.
Manfred Novak, the UN special rapporteur on torture, said: “President Obama came to power with a moral agenda, saying we don’t want to be seen to be a nation responsible for major human rights violations.”
A failure to investigate credible claims of complicity in torture, Novak suggested, would be a failure of the Obama government to recognise US obligations under international law.
He said that states were prohibited from transferring detainees to other countries that could pose a risk to their personal safety. Experts who studied the documents said this principle appeared to have been breached.
Novak said it was not enough for Obama’s administration to suggest the alleged crimes took place before it came to power. But the Pentagon dismissed Novak’s concerns. It said: “We have fulfilled our obligations to report it [torture].”
The US Defence Department condemned the WikiLeaks release, describing the documents as raw observations by tactical units, which were only snapshots of tragic, mundane events. Assange said the snapshots of everyday events offered a glimpse at the “human scale” of the conflict. He told the news conference his motive for the disclosure was “about the truth”.
Iraq Body Count, a private British-based group that has tracked the number of Iraqi civilians killed since the war began in 2003, said its analysis of the logs had raised its total of civilian deaths from 107,369 to more than 122,000. IBC, which worked with WikiLeaks, said the war logs showed there were more than 109,000 violent deaths between 2004 and the end of 2009. They included 66,081 civilians, 23,984 people classed as “enemy”, 15,196 members of the Iraqi security forces, and 3,771 coalition troops.
John Sloboda of IBC said: “They [the documents] show the relentless grind of daily killings in almost every town or village in every province.”
While many Iraqi civilians welcome the release of the documents, the country’s prime minister accused WikiLeaks of an attempt to sabotage his re-election hopes. Nouri al-Maliki, a Shiite, has been fighting for more than seven months to keep his job after national elections in March failed to produce a clear winner.
The release was also roundly condemned by the American authorities. Hillary Clinton, the US secretary of state, attacked the disclosure of any classified information that threatened national security, or put at risk the lives of coalition forces or civilians. Pentagon press secretary Geoff Morrell called the release “shameful” and said it “could potentially undermine our nation’s security”.
However, Assange said the Pentagon allegations were “simply not true” and that he was confident Iraqis were not named in the documents. He said the documents, published in a heavily censored form, contained “no information that could be harmful to any individual”.
Undeterred by the Pentagon’s reaction, WikiLeaks promised today to publish 15,000 more documents about the war in Afghanistan.
Daniel Ellsberg, the former US military analyst who leaked documents in 1971 revealing how the American public was misled about the Vietnam war, made a surprise appearance at today’s news conference and accused President Obama of attempting to stem the flow of military information.
Ellsberg, 79, also criticised Obama for playing a legal “experiment” with the arrest of US army whistleblower Bradley Manning, who is suspected of leaking a previous cache of war documents to WikiLeaks. Manning is in US military custody and faces a court martial next year.
Debt Settlement Back End Processing And Just What It Means To You
Last Updated on Thursday, 14 October 2010 08:53 Written by Richard Johnson Thursday, 14 October 2010 08:53
You almost certainly are aware that your credit standing will be checked while making a request for a loan, but did you also know it may be checked while applying for insurance, leasing a flat, or trying to get a job? It is actually true. Is there a basis for determining your credit score, and exactly what is the average American credit score? Being aware of this will let you understand how you match up to other individuals in the United States, for better or worse. Almost everybody has heard of credit scores, and they know it has something to do with your previous credit reliability, but few individuals know how the scoring process operates.
Credit scores range from a low of 300 up to a perfect score of 850. Needless to say most people will end up somewhere between those figures. Basic math tells us that the average of 300 and 850 is 575, but in reality, the typical American credit score is quite a bit higher, hovering right around 690. Nonetheless, some analysts are forecasting an overall decrease in that average as more and more people are affected by the situation of the overall economy.
Although 690 seems like it’s a good total above the expected average, it actually is not all that great if you might be keen on having the best deals from the majority of loan creditors. In reality, most financiers will certainly look at your credit history before deciding whether they lend money to you or not, if perhaps collateral will probably be needed from you, how long the time period of your loan is going to be, as well as the interest rate they will charge you. It’s obvious that the lower your credit score, the more it will cost you in the long run.
Because many lenders operate on their own, there’s no all-encompassing rule as to what number will give you the best offer. However, according to a number of research, the magic number, in most cases, is a credit score that’s at 720 or higher. Therefore, acquiring an “normal” score of 690 can in fact hurt you on a financial basis, by keeping you from obtaining the best possible terms. Once again, each loan company differs from the others, therefore it always pays to search around. However, in case your score is a bit below normal (usually 620 or lower) you will have to look much harder to get anybody that is willing and eager to give you financing at all. Although, it’s still possible, your rates will be higher in comparison to individuals with a higher score.
There are some analysts that forecast the lenders will eventually have to provide more loans to those with lower credit ratings. After all, they only earn money when they lend money out, and if so many people have lower scores, they will need to reassess their guidelines if they wish to remain profitable.
If you plan on getting a new job, a mortgage loan, car or insurance plan, then you must do anything you can to have your credit score higher. The average American credit score ought to be regarded as the lowest end of the scale (not 300) in order to receive the best rates.
Debt settlement processing can guide you to obtain a higher credit rate so that you can have a very successful mortgage approval. Debt settlement backend could also help you with other concerns with regards to your credit card.
Facts About Succeeding With A Disability Claim
Last Updated on Thursday, 14 October 2010 08:53 Written by James K. Smith Thursday, 14 October 2010 08:53
In the instance that you’re unable to work on account of a impairment and are thinking about asking for Social Security Disability (SSD) benefits, usually there are many factors to consider. It’s quite likely true that you probably should not be reluctant to file your SSD or SSI (Supplemental Security Income) claims, because they could take several months’ time to process. Before you start doing this, however, conduct research or visit an attorney at law so you’re sure of exactly what to look forward to – because, whether you believe it or not, the things you think you know relating to social security might possibly be wrong. Listed below are some of the most common misconceptions, and several details to steer you in just the right direction.
1. Everyone’s very first Social Security inquiry is declined.
Though it is true just about over two thirds of the cases are dismissed on the 1st application, this shouldn’t mean yours is unlikely to be approved. Instead of giving up, as countless do, the most effective method is to follow the appeals process. Re-applying completely might only prolong the amount of time it requires prior to when your claim is recognized by a judge, and possibly recognized.
2) Obtaining a letter provided by your doctor will instantly aid yourapplication for SSD.
Having a letter by your physician does not allow you to be eligible for disability benefits. At the start of the examination, if those perusing your application are inclined to refuse it, a letter from a doctor might not be very effective. Additionally, if or when your case reaches a judge (the final phase before getting your benefits), a note from your physician that is unbiased and descriptive may be a big help. A court recognizes and values the professional viewpoint of a health care provider, especially one that has actually been accountable for the claimant’s treatment methods over an extended amount of time.
3) The compulsory clinical test could be an appraisal of needs and implies possible future courses of attention.
A Consultant Exam, or CE, can be compulsory so that you can collect social security. Despite common belief, this particular examination doesn’t indicate additional medical treatments, referrals, diagnoses or medications. The only real objective of these tests is for people going over your claim to include recent details for a smattering of key physical indicators. Normally, the evaluation demands fewer than 20 or so minutes and rarely goes any deeper than blood pressure and pulse rate, reflexes, respiration, joint flexibility and physical strength. In matters of mental incapacity, the examination is lengthier and a bit more comprehensive.
4) You’ll be told if the claim has been accepted in three to four months.
While a large number of people might be told they will be accepted or rejected between ninety days to 120 days, it may well take more time. The Disability Determination Service, who will be in control of your case as it’s pending, attempts to always be as comprehensive as possible in concluding if your claim shall be accepted. The bottom line is, doing this can take time.
5) If my doctor’s released me, I can refrain from getting remedies.
If you you expect to ensure success during your disability claim,you may want to pay a visit to a health care professional no less than once every two months. (This does not always imply the same physician.) A judge or disability examiner will not make their final decision on old specifics; if there’s no reasonable, new medical report to read, there’s almost no purpose for the disability claim.
If you’re hoping to claim Social Security Disability benefits, it can be difficult to understand the ins and outs of the laws. Consulting a knowledgeable Albany disability lawyer can help you understand, and expedite, the process.
How To Find Totally Free Legal Guidance That’s At Par With Paid Guidance
Last Updated on Thursday, 14 October 2010 08:43 Written by Ericka Dawson Thursday, 14 October 2010 08:43
If you wish to get totally free authorized guidance for asserts and claims then it’s supposed to be the toughest process to be accomplished by a lot of the individuals nevertheless it isn’t accurate. The fact is that it’s feasible to obtain totally free legal guidance from the best lawyers. In this article, you’ll arrive across some of the most substantial tips which will help you in obtaining free advice so as to get cent % reimbursement for claims.
Should you log in to web, you’ll come to know that web is flooded with numbers of free authorized advice so as to get claim for private or criminal damage. It’s worth to become noticed that there is no prescribed web site on web where you are able to make an attempt to search for associated info. This info is collected through internet with the help of content articles and blogs. Apart from those, this info may also be collected from posts and forums on web. A lot of the articles and blogs on web are so useful that they assist you out in almost all of the instances.
Also, it’s suggested to get suitable guidance prior to you go to obtain this kind of advice from website on web. Also, when you take assist from blogs or articles, it should be ensured that info on that page is cent percent authorized and true.
Secondly, before you visit take free legal advice, it is strictly advised that you simply should visit authorized professional who’s certified from government. Authorized aid should always be taken from such legal persons. Also at such situations, your parents or your pals might know some facts about it and might guide you that might or might not be true. Hence in this kind of forensic instances, assist ought to be taken from authorized individuals and ought to never go for the advice of your colleagues.
Also, when you go for hiring solicitors for private damage, it must be ensured that solicitors hired by you are linked with law society and personal lawyer’s association. Also it should be ensured that solicitors that you have hired ought to not charge you much more than suggested and what’s legal.
Visit free legal advice for your one-stop site for all advice.